The Zeigarnik Effect and Quest Logs

What do waiters in a 1920s Venetian restaurant and today’s average role-playing game fan have in common? They both tend to remember what they have yet to finish.

Sometime during the 1920s, Russian psychologist Bluma Zeigarnik was sitting in an Austrian restaurant (or maybe German; accounts differ) when she noticed something peculiar: waiters displayed an unusual ability to remember complex orders while they were being filled, allowing them to deliver the right combination of food to the right tables. But oddly, that information vanished from memory as soon as the eats were put in place (or maybe it was after the bill was paid; again, accounts differ). It didn’t seem to have much to do with sustained mental effort or chanting the incomplete orders under their breath to hold them in short-term memory. Instead, the orders that hadn’t yet been filled just seemed to nag at the waiters’ minds until they were checked off as complete.

Back in her lab, Zeigarnik pursued this idea and ran some experiments (Zeigarnik, 1927) involving the completion of various tasks or puzzles. Some of the subjects performing the tasks were interrupted, then everyone was asked to describe what tasks they had done. Like the waiters remembering what orders still needed to go to what tables, subjects were far more likely to recall the tasks they had started but hadn’t completed.

This “Zeigarnik effect” subsequently entered the psychology lexicon to describe how we tend to find it easier to recall a task –and the details surrounding it– when we feel like we have begun to undertake it, but been unable to complete it. Apparently we as humans don’t like it when we begin something and don’t finish it, and such circumstances create an internal tension and preoccupation with the task. Completing the task provides closure, release of the tension, and –not to put too technical a term on it– goodie feelie type feels.

Okay, before I leave this area I need to ...ah man. That's a lot of stuff!

When I played Skyrim, this is all I could picture at night when trying to go to sleep.

And we see this all the time in games, particularly role-playing games where in-game journals get crammed full of unfinished quests, errands, and tasks. Ever wring your hands over a huge list of incomplete quests or feel hesitant to progress the main quest until all those little side missions are checked off? To see the effect in action the next time you play a RPG try at the end of your gaming session to recall as many open quests as you can relative to completed quests.

And MMOs like World of Warcraft are the worst with this stuff, as anyone who has collected 13 out of 14 Goretusk livers can attest. Once we begin one of these tasks, they hang around in the back of our mind and are much easier to recall than completed tasks. Researchers Scott Rigby and Richard Ryan specifically call out the Zeigarnik effect in their book Glued to Games: How Video Games Draw Us In and Hold Us Spellbound:

MMOs are designed so that your list of tasks is never done. No sooner do you complete one, then two more pop up to take its place. Like a digital game of whack-a-mole, accomplishment only brings more unfinished business. As soon as you finish or “turn in” a quest, you are immediately offered another one with an even bigger reward. Or perhaps completion of one “unlocks” the opportunity to receive many new quests at once. Quests are often linked together in a series that helps move a story along, but never provides much closure. If I need to find 12 jewels to complete my quest, I will not stop at 11.

We also see this happen in empire building game series like Sim City or Civilization. The “just one more turn” is a direct result of the Zeigarnik effect, since that one more turn is almost always in the service of completing some structure, upgrade, technology, or conquest.

Familiar with the "just one more turn" phenomenon? Isn't it funny how it usually happens because you're waiting for some upgrade to finish?

Familiar with the “just one more turn” phenomenon? Isn’t it funny how it usually happens because you’re waiting for some upgrade to finish?

And researchers have continued to study the Zeigarnik effect and refine models associated with it. Schiffman and Greist-Bousquet (1992), for example, found that people over-estimated how long they spent on interrupted tasks, even when the time spent was the same as completed tasks (probably compounded by the availability heuristic, which causes us to overestimate how big or frequent something is based on how easy it is to recall examples of it). Other researchers have noted how the Zeigarnik effect isn’t completely reliable and have explored moderating factors like how motivated people are to do the task (e.g., Reeve, Cole, & Olson 1986), the nature of the interruption, or task difficulty.

But regardless of whether the effect shows up every time a task is interrupted, it does often happen. The next time you find yourself thinking “just two more turns until this research is complete” or “I just need to kill the trolls to make this quest log entry go away” remember Bulga Zeigarnik and her waiters filling orders for hot dogs and waffles. Or something. I honestly don’t know what they eat in Austria.

Reeve, J., Cole, S., and Olson, B. (1986). The Zeigarnik Effect and Intrinsic Motivation: Are They The Same? Motivation and Emototion, 10(3), 233-245.

Rigby, S. and Ryan, R. (2011). Glued to Games: How Video Games Draw Us In and Hold Us Spellbound. Santa Barbara, California: Praeger.

Schiffman, N., Greist-Bousquet, S. (1992). The effect of task interruption and closure on perceived duration. Bulletin of the Psychometiric Society, 30 (1), 9-11.

Zeigarnik, B. (1927). Uber das Behalten yon erledigten und underledigten Handlungen. Psychologische Forschung, 9, 1-85.

Follow me on Twitter, Facebook, or RSS.

12 thoughts on “The Zeigarnik Effect and Quest Logs

  1. I think Minecraft is also a very good example of this effect. Except that Minecraft doesn’t give you a task list, you create it yourself.

    Because of the endless possibilities you dream up all kinds of creations and start to make plans for how to build them. And that’s where the quest log appears.

    And because of the day/night cycle and the monsters that appear during night time, you’re always interrupted from your outside tasks and move inside to attend to other tasks. By the time the night is over, you often forget what you were doing the day before, but have already made new plans for the coming day. On your new adventures you stumble across the stuff your were working on the day before, and that reminds you of your old plans. So, in the light of the new plans you combine them both to some grand deluxe mega plan, and it just never ends! But I love it. :-)

    The way I see it, Minecraft has an infinite quest log.

    I think the reason why I like that more than e.g. the quest log that appears in every game on Facebook, is that I created the quest log myself. I get to choose my own adventures and I can change, cancel and postpone any quests I like without having to use some quest log tool to manage all the quests. They’re all in my head.

    • That’s a pretty good point about Minecraft. Even if there is no quest log, I always have a mental list of things to build or find.

  2. Pingback: ATITD: The Psychology of the Pilgrimage | Why I Game

  3. Pingback: Links for March 7, 2013 | Andrzej's Links

  4. Some of our typical austrian meals include “Wiener Schnitzel”, “Schweinsbraten”, “Apfelstrudel” or “Tafelspitz”, but Pizza, burgers or chinese food are great as well :-)

    Nice insight into that Zeigarnik, now that I think about it, it really seems to happen quite often.

  5. Hi. Thanks for this post.
    I remember close to nothing from learning psychology at high school, and it’s cool to recall it now within such an interesting context – thanks to you!
    What I remember though is that Zeigarnik’s name is Bluma, not Bulma. Hope it helps.

  6. I often think of Borderlands as “The most entertaining checklist I’ve ever played”, just because the narrative was so threadbare that the core mechanic appeared to be just checking off tasks. Still compelling though.

  7. Perhaps we’re overthinking this a bit. If you have a list of tasks the one you complete don’t get you in trouble. The ones you fail to complete can get you shouted at, sullen silences, fired etc depending on the task you failed.

    In games the quests you don’t complete are the ones you don’t get the reward for, which is the equivalent to getting in trouble.

    Certainly your waiters will have a big modifer on the memory for unfilled orders – their boss.

    There might be less to this effect than there seems to be.

    • Oh yeah, I don’t think anyone would argue that it’s the ONLY effect, or even that it’s the strongest in all situations. But it’s there.

  8. Pingback: The Alluring Affect of Achievements on Game Design | Game Wisdom

Leave a comment